1. to observe whether CTCF interact with EBV Rta by Immunoprecipitation assay
a) in TW01 inducible cell lines, CTCF and Flag-Rta can not be immunoprecipitated by each other. I also tried Flag beads, which are provided by Sigma, both of Flag-Luc and Flag-ER caught CTCF. I can not prove the interaction between CTCF and EBV Rta in TW01 inducible cell lines.
b) in co-transfected HEK293/293FT cell lines(Flag-Luc/ER/KR), CTCF can immunoprecipitate Flag-ER. However, the ratio of each plasmid is unfair, i will adjust the amount of these plasmids (may ignore Luc) and perform this experiment again.
2. to screen 12 putative target genes in CTCF/Flag-ChIP samples
利用Q-PCR的方式, 這12個genes無法在CTCF-ChIP的samples中被偵測到; 但利用一般PCR的方式, 則可偵測到JUN及H19(雖然band很微弱)
a) 在ChIP之前的sonication片段可能太短, 以至於所設計的這些將近500 bp PCR product的primer不能bind上DNA
b) ChIP的效率不好, 在抗體/磁珠/sample量的比例上該做些調整
Aug 31, 2011
Aug 29, 2011
8/24 Lab Meeting-ingrid
(1) 用IP將KR抓下,用WB(RL2)來確認O-GlcNAc變化程度;經更改IP流程,可以有效率以KR(660) from ICON將KR抓下(ERKV_Dox48h),但是之後應用於ERKV_shLuc_Dox48h、ERKV_shOGTA1_Dox48h及ERKV_shMGEA5B2_Dox48h,卻效率不佳,以致於後來的RL2及PARP1皆無法辨認。目前持續改進IP流程中。Note:如果是要看KR蛋白質,建議Lysis buffer要加phosphotase inhibitor以避免KR的碎裂。
(2) 關於進行shRNA的Q-PCR,已完成實驗數據。但是分析時,應注意星號的標誌,正確為*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001(星號應水平標誌)。
(3) 經由計算細胞生長速率及考慮表現Luc蛋白質的程度,混合細胞得到TW01TetLuc pool :#2+ #8及TW05TetLuc pool:#1+ #3+ #5。
(4) 三種Flag Ab測試(Sigma F1804舊、Cell Signaling及Sigma F1804新):認識Luc蛋白質在TW01TetLuc pool及TW05TetLuc pool的titer皆差不多,除了Cell Signaling背景比較髒。
(2) 關於進行shRNA的Q-PCR,已完成實驗數據。但是分析時,應注意星號的標誌,正確為*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001(星號應水平標誌)。
(3) 經由計算細胞生長速率及考慮表現Luc蛋白質的程度,混合細胞得到TW01TetLuc pool :#2+ #8及TW05TetLuc pool:#1+ #3+ #5。
(4) 三種Flag Ab測試(Sigma F1804舊、Cell Signaling及Sigma F1804新):認識Luc蛋白質在TW01TetLuc pool及TW05TetLuc pool的titer皆差不多,除了Cell Signaling背景比較髒。
Aug 23, 2011
8/17 Lab meeting-蔡小丸
1. 在HEK293細胞中共同表達KR, S634A/S636A, Luc及不同量的Pin1, 結果發現大量的Pin1會造成KR, S634A/S636A, Luc蛋白量的降低, 由於Luc已知不會與Pin1交互作用, 因此大量Pin1可能部份造成細胞general的影響了。
2. IP結果初步看到, KR及S634A/S636A會被sumo-1所修飾, Luc則沒有, S634A/S636A被sumo-1修飾的能力較差, 但仍需進一步實驗確認sumo-1修飾KR及S634A/S636A所扮演的角色。
2. IP結果初步看到, KR及S634A/S636A會被sumo-1所修飾, Luc則沒有, S634A/S636A被sumo-1修飾的能力較差, 但仍需進一步實驗確認sumo-1修飾KR及S634A/S636A所扮演的角色。
Aug 11, 2011
8/10 Lab meeting
1. The trial of new medium KGM-2 ── comparing with medium DKSFM/EpiLife for culturing NP460hTert:
(1) Cells culturing in KGM-2 showed more like triangle shape rather than elongated morphology as seeding in DKSFM/EpiLife.
(2) Cells culturing in KGM-2 had slower proliferation rate (Doubling time:55.4hrs) than culturing in DKSFM/EpiLife medium (Doubling time:36hrs).
2.Different [Ca2+] treatments for 6 days in KGM-2 medium for NP460hTert
(1) Along the treatment, cells in 2 calcium free treatments showed poor adhesion to the dish (細胞沒有延伸或突觸等的貼附形態出現). *Mortality rate:32% and 35%.
(2) Cells in 0.1mM [Ca2+] showed good adhesion (細胞亦無層疊的現象) and had the lowest mortality rate (11%) among all treaments.
(3) Cells in 0.5mM,1mM and 1.5 mM Ca2+ showed the tendency to cluster and pile up together under high Ca2+ culture.(第四天後細胞堆疊明顯)
(4) Cells in 1.5mM Ca2+ showed the highest mortality rate (48%), almost 50% of the cells were dead at the measuring time. The mortality of 1mM Ca2+ treatment weas 24%, 0.5mM Ca2+ was27%.
(5) After trypisinization, cells didn't look bigger when counting.(通常要準備走上senescence或分化的細胞會變較大)
討論結果:
(1) KGM-2和DKSFM/EpiLife下細胞生長形態的照片因為seeding不均勻的關係,要再重新試驗新種下比較均勻的10cm dish中再照一次。(8/10已重照完畢)
(2) 不同鈣離子濃度的試驗因為細胞種的不均勻可再做一次試驗(等下禮拜一母盤有夠多的細胞),而其中一個無鈣離子的對照組可改為0.05mM來試驗(0.1mM still a little bit high or not?!)
(3) 下禮拜可以使用不同濃度的retinoic acid treatment!(in medium DKSFM/EpiLife or KGM-2),可試試看曹老師用serum來促進differentiation的方法!
Aug 10, 2011
08/10 Lab Meeting- 小夏
1. 在TW01TetER及TW05TetER上Serum starvation的條件: 6-well種50000-100000 incubate 48h,serum free組與complete medium組相比,serum free組細胞數少,細胞長得細細長長,在細胞數與細胞型態上有差異性。
補充:根據之前flow data (call cycle analysis) 看48小時的實驗,細胞6-well種100000不至於過滿,200000細胞會過滿。所以我偏愛100000 incubate 48h的condition。接著模仿MB教授的實驗方法看看serum (glucose順道一起看)對Rta-induced cellular senescence.的重要性。(Ref)
2. Establishment of TW05-EREV:
結果:
(1) PEG濃縮病毒可以提高virus infection的效率(5%至20%, combine TGFbeta可達到30%),而TGFbeta則效果不彰。
(2) 細胞先放大至6-cm dish,再種1000顆細胞至10 cm dish進行G418 selection的過程中細胞便死光。
討論:
從12-well放大不要一下就放到6-cm dish中,建議先至6-well較適當。而G418 selection的步驟應該要在細胞放大時就做,防止沒有病毒的細胞勢力擴大。
若現在手邊的細胞已經沒有綠光的存在了,便重新開始以濃縮病毒的方式感染細胞。
補充:根據之前flow data (call cycle analysis) 看48小時的實驗,細胞6-well種100000不至於過滿,200000細胞會過滿。所以我偏愛100000 incubate 48h的condition。接著模仿MB教授的實驗方法看看serum (glucose順道一起看)對Rta-induced cellular senescence.的重要性。(Ref)
2. Establishment of TW05-EREV:
結果:
(1) PEG濃縮病毒可以提高virus infection的效率(5%至20%, combine TGFbeta可達到30%),而TGFbeta則效果不彰。
(2) 細胞先放大至6-cm dish,再種1000顆細胞至10 cm dish進行G418 selection的過程中細胞便死光。
討論:
從12-well放大不要一下就放到6-cm dish中,建議先至6-well較適當。而G418 selection的步驟應該要在細胞放大時就做,防止沒有病毒的細胞勢力擴大。
若現在手邊的細胞已經沒有綠光的存在了,便重新開始以濃縮病毒的方式感染細胞。
NP460hTERT in KGM2
由 sufang 在 三, 08/10/2011 - 14:54 發表 Older Posts EBV infection EBV Rta NP460hTERT transient lytic
2011/08/10 Lab Meeting
1. The trial of new medium KGM-2 ── comparing with medium DKSFM/EpiLife for culturing NP460hTert:
(1) Cells culturing in KGM-2 showed more like triangle shape rather than elongated morphology as seeding in DKSFM/EpiLife.
(2) Cells culturing in KGM-2 had slower proliferation rate (Doubling time:55.4hrs) than culturing in DKSFM/EpiLife medium (Doubling time:36hrs).
2.Different [Ca2+] treatments for 6 days in KGM-2 medium for NP460hTert
(1) Along the treatment, cells in 2 calcium free treatments showed poor adhesion to the dish (細胞沒有延伸或突觸等的貼附形態出現). *Mortality rate:32% and 35%.
(2) Cells in 0.1mM [Ca2+] showed good adhesion (細胞亦無層疊的現象) and had the lowest mortality rate (11%) among all treaments.
(3) Cells in 0.5mM,1mM and 1.5 mM Ca2+ showed the tendency to cluster and pile up together under high Ca2+ culture.(第四天後細胞堆疊明顯)
(4) Cells in 1.5mM Ca2+ showed the highest mortality rate (48%), almost 50% of the cells were dead at the measuring time. The mortality of 1mM Ca2+ treatment weas 24%, 0.5mM Ca2+ was27%.
(5) After trypisinization, cells didn't look bigger when counting.(通常要準備走上senescence或分化的細胞會變較大)
討論結果:
(1) KGM-2和DKSFM/EpiLife下細胞生長形態的照片因為seeding不均勻的關係,要再重新試驗新種下比較均勻的10cm dish中再照一次。(8/10已重照完畢)
(2) 不同鈣離子濃度的試驗因為細胞種的不均勻可再做一次試驗(等下禮拜一母盤有夠多的細胞),而其中一個無鈣離子的對照組可改為0.05mM來試驗(0.1mM still a little bit high or not?!)
(3) 下禮拜可以使用不同濃度的retinoic acid treatment!(in medium DKSFM/EpiLife or KGM-2),可試試看曹老師用serum來促進differentiation的方法!
2 comments:
SFL 8/11/11, 11:21 AM
Yes,as Ingrid pointed out the "old" medium contains Ca2+ at a concentration of (60uM+<100um 0.1mm="" 30="" 50um="" a="" about="" after="" although="" and="" but="" can="" cells="" change="" chronic="" cut="" difference.="" does="" down="" far="" give="" good="" gradually="" if="" ingrid="" it="" make="" may="" natures="" p="" s="" seems="" so="" some="" that="" their="" to="" try.="" um="" we="" while="" why="" worried="" xxum="">
Yes,as Ingrid pointed out the "old" medium contains Ca2+ at a concentration of (60uM+<100um 0.1mm="" 30="" 50um="" a="" about="" after="" although="" and="" but="" can="" cells="" change="" chronic="" cut="" difference.="" does="" down="" far="" give="" good="" gradually="" if="" ingrid="" it="" make="" may="" natures="" p="" s="" seems="" so="" some="" that="" their="" to="" try.="" um="" we="" while="" why="" worried="" xxum="">
小嬿 8/11/11, 12:50 PM
仲峻學長看過母盤NP460的照片覺得細胞的morphology跟他之前的印象不一樣(現在的細胞比剛recover時更長, 且有些交疊),會不會我們現在用的DKSFM+EpiLife不夠新鮮,導致他變形?(手上medium已經快用完了,將準備新的1L medium~)
100um>仲峻學長看過母盤NP460的照片覺得細胞的morphology跟他之前的印象不一樣(現在的細胞比剛recover時更長, 且有些交疊),會不會我們現在用的DKSFM+EpiLife不夠新鮮,導致他變形?(手上medium已經快用完了,將準備新的1L medium~)
08/10/2011
Asia/Taipei
Aug 4, 2011
08/03 Lab Meeting-小嬿
進度報告
1. 在HEK293分別做Flag-Luc/ER/KR/gZ的transient transfection 24hrs,
a. IP CTCF: 1/6 of IP中, WB CTCF未有band-->用5/6的memebrane check again;
5/6 of IP中看到ER (by 467), 微弱的gZ(by 4F10), 未見KR(by Yoshi's);
b. IP Flag: 失敗! 1/20 of IP可見Flag蛋白被IP下來, 但未見CTCF!
@WHT建議二抗濃度可再做調整, 讓background更乾淨(e.g. ~100 kD的band)
@在TW01系統試試看!
@SFL建議在293FT做transfection效果更佳! (plus co-co-co-transfection!)
2. 利用ChIP分析TW01TetER_16細胞中, 在Dox induction的狀況下, CTCF所binding的DNA fragment量是否有所改變
-->依據Q-PCR結果顯示, input DNA量不穩定, 影響CTCF IP的數值計算; mock(IgG) IP所得DNA量較少, Ct值SD非常大
@SFL建議做少一點sample量, IP CTCF和Rta, 並且screen先前擬定偵測的gene
GOGOGO! 往PLoS Pathogen邁進!!!
1. 在HEK293分別做Flag-Luc/ER/KR/gZ的transient transfection 24hrs,
a. IP CTCF: 1/6 of IP中, WB CTCF未有band-->用5/6的memebrane check again;
5/6 of IP中看到ER (by 467), 微弱的gZ(by 4F10), 未見KR(by Yoshi's);
b. IP Flag: 失敗! 1/20 of IP可見Flag蛋白被IP下來, 但未見CTCF!
@WHT建議二抗濃度可再做調整, 讓background更乾淨(e.g. ~100 kD的band)
@在TW01系統試試看!
@SFL建議在293FT做transfection效果更佳! (plus co-co-co-transfection!)
2. 利用ChIP分析TW01TetER_16細胞中, 在Dox induction的狀況下, CTCF所binding的DNA fragment量是否有所改變
-->依據Q-PCR結果顯示, input DNA量不穩定, 影響CTCF IP的數值計算; mock(IgG) IP所得DNA量較少, Ct值SD非常大
@SFL建議做少一點sample量, IP CTCF和Rta, 並且screen先前擬定偵測的gene
GOGOGO! 往PLoS Pathogen邁進!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)