Aug 5, 2014

2014/08/05 關於FGFR3 IHC

 

整理FGFR3已發表文章中使用Santa Cruz的anti-FGFR3(B9) 的條件及染色情形(圖片1-4)(圖片5為DDR1染在細胞核及染在細胞質)

1.後來發現  原參考論文2013 J Pathol中的CC1 buffer為偏鹼的條件(PH=8) (之前疏忽了 抱歉!!)

  所以 使用PH=6的buffer應該是較不恰當(non-specific較高) 因此會請小夏詢價 買CC1 buffer再做做看 應該就可知道答案了

2. 雖然大多FGFR3都染在細胞質或膜上 但不能排除FGFR3 fusion可能出在核中

tou_ying_pian_1_0.jpgtou_ying_pian_2_0.jpgtou_ying_pian_3_0.jpgtou_ying_pian_4_0.jpgtou_ying_pian_5_0.jpg

 

08/05/2014
Asia/Taipei


IHC of FGFR3 in oral and bladder tissue microar

http://eln.nhri.org.tw/lims/?q=node/1798

By Natsumi, published on 2014/10/9

有關2013 J Pathol中的使用CC1 buffer

2013 J Pathol使用的unmasking buffer: CC1 (Tris/Borate/EDTA, pH8)
 
詢問結果如下:
Cell Conditioning 1 (CC1)
Catalog Number: 950-124
Quantity: 2 L bottle
Format: Ready to Use (非10倍!!)
售價:NTD 28,000/ bottle  (沒錯,沒有多一個0!!!)
 
網站連結有package insert及MSDS
 
是撘配VENTANA做IHC機器所使用的buffer,CC1是他們偏鹼的buffer (pH8),另外一個CC2是偏酸的buffer (pH6)。
因為價格也滿昂貴的,我想不適合我們使用。
 
這樣我們兩個選擇就是

0.1M citrate buffer, pH6 與 TEG, pH9 (10mM Tris+ 0.5mM EGTA)這兩個unmasking buffer。
 
 
我也粗淺判斷了一下後面的圖,回應於下方(要到下一頁看,並且要上下頁來回對應一下了,Sorry...)。

加入H&E stain 的AE715

Antigen retrieval在ph9的條件下,染在的位置大部分在細胞質(如黑色箭頭所示),

而pH6的條件下,FGFR3染到的位置主要在細胞核(如紅色箭頭所示)。

那TW2.6呢?

在pH9也有許多positive啊! 恐怕這才是non-specific staining吧! 還有,在已發表的paper中,即便是低視野,藍染部份都看得到,為什麼我們的染色大部分都是咖啡色?

 

TW2.6沒有染到咖啡色喔

1. 我覺得 TW2.6並沒有染到咖啡色 (LiLi也是這樣說的) 

2. paper中藍色的核 可以看到是因為 FGFR3的咖啡色染在細胞質

3. PH6的染色  看不到核的藍色  是因為咖啡色都疊在它上面(所以 判定他在核內) 

回應

1. 妳的意思是說 pH9, TW2.6那些都不算是染到,但是它上面的C9就算? 可以請妳們把這個panel, C9中是的都圈起來(紅色outline), TW2.6中不是的也都圈起來(白色outline).
2. 同意。
3. 可以把你們覺得沒有染到的細胞、應該看得到藍色的細胞圈起來嗎? C9/TW2.6都好。我catch不到妳們所謂的藍色核在哪裡, 長得怎麼樣。唯有把核的顏色與形狀弄清楚 再來判斷C9細胞中FGFR3-TACC3咖啡色染色情形。

我圈出細胞核的部份

還有因為染的FGFR3的顏色不深  所以LiLi建議hematoxylin不要染太久 否則會蓋過FGFR3的染色 因此藍色很淡(這部分應該可以再調整) 細胞核我用綠色圈出來(我沒有每顆圈)(相對藍色的地方  就是核) TW2.6幾乎染不到 咖啡色

tou_ying_pian_7.jpgtou_ying_pian_5_1.jpg

 

說明核與質的H&E染色

先利用H&E stain解釋一下細胞核跟細胞質的位置

H(hematoxylin)& E(eosin) staining,其中hematoxylin為鹼性的dye,所以會染上核(藍色),eosin為酸性的dye 所以會染上細胞質顏色為桃紅色 如下所示(綠圈圈為核)

tou_ying_pian_2_1.jpgtou_ying_pian_3_1.jpg

我把C9 positive圈起來(紅色框)

我把C9 positive 用紅色框框圈起來 如下

tou_ying_pian_8.jpg

























































































請問Paper上的圖 (Figure

請問Paper上的圖 (Figure 5),如果不看Figure legend的話,是核還是質? 需要請病理醫師協助嗎?

 
Figure S3 in another paper.
 

我也初淺判斷一下

Fig 5

FGFR2 病人1:細胞質 病人2:細胞質 病人3:細胞質與細胞核 病人4:細胞質 病人5:細胞質與細胞核 病人6:細胞質與細胞核。

FGFR3 看起來6位病人細胞質與細胞核都有。

 

FigS3

以Tumor FGFR2 fusion(-)比較Tumor FGFR2 fusion(+) positive staining在細胞質與細胞核皆有。

 

==> 這些PAPER看起,FGFR2 or FGFR3的細胞質在這些病人當中皆有positive staining,

當中有些病人是除了細胞質以外,細胞核也有positive staining。

細胞質與細胞核都有的染色幾乎是整片深褐色。

我貼的DDR1 IHC就是由朱醫生判定的喔

若我來看覺得

1.Fig5 (同樣都是patient4)

FGFR2: 在細胞質  FGFR3: 在核跟質

2.FigS3

FGFR2: 在細胞核跟質

3.我貼的DDR1染色 是朱醫師判定的

summary

1. 原則上anti-FGFR3 (Santa Cruz, clone:B9) 不論在PH=6或PH=9 retrival條件下對於C9及TW2.6都是有區分性的

  (C9: +, TW2.6: -)

2. 但由於PH=6下主要染到細胞核(雖然有一些些染到細胞質) 覺得有點奇怪 (因為分核質的實驗應該有點參考性),而且只要呈30 sec顏色就出來了,所以覺得這條件下應該非特異性結合高,誤判比例可能會增高

3. 在PH=9下主要染到細胞質也有細胞核,而且用肉眼看比例也不少

4. 再根據以往利用anti-FGFR3 (Santa Cruz, clone:B9) 所發表的paper大多都是在微鹼(PH=8-9)下進行,所以我們認為微鹼下進行retrial的條件應該是比較適合的

tou_ying_pian_6_0.jpgtou_ying_pian_4_1.jpg

 

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)

由 sufang 在 二, 08/05/2014 - 09:15 發表 Pre-published CAA cholangiocarcinoma Gene Fusion NSC104

重要文獻 (Research Note: CAA, keyword: cholangiocarcinoma):
1    Gu, T. L., X. Deng, F. Huang, M. Tucker, K. Crosby, V. Rimkunas, Y. Wang, G. Deng, L. Zhu, Z. Tan, Y. Hu, C. Wu, J. Nardone, J. MacNeill, J. Ren, C. Reeves, G. Innocenti, B. Norris, J. Yuan, J. Yu, H. Haack, B. Shen, C. Peng, H. Li, X. Zhou, X. Liu, J. Rush, and M. J. Comb. Survey of tyrosine kinase signaling reveals ROS kinase fusions in human cholangiocarcinoma. (2011). PLoS One. 6: e15640. pdf 3780,  DDR1 and CCA (cholangiocarcinoma). In BB2013Sep.  FIG-ROS1    Cholangiocarcinoma, also known as bile duct cancer, is the second most common primary hepatic carcinoma with a median survival of less than 2 years. The molecular mechanisms underlying the development of this disease are not clear. To survey activated tyrosine kinases signaling in cholangiocarcinoma, we employed immunoaffinity profiling coupled to mass spectrometry and identified DDR1, EPHA2, EGFR, and ROS tyrosine kinases, along with over 1,000 tyrosine phosphorylation sites from about 750 different proteins in primary cholangiocarcinoma patients. Furthermore, we confirmed the presence of ROS kinase fusions in 8.7% (2 out of 23) of cholangiocarcinoma patients. Expression of the ROS fusions in 3T3 cells confers transforming ability both in vitro and in vivo, and is responsive to its kinase inhibitor. Our data demonstrate that ROS kinase is a promising candidate for a therapeutic target and for a diagnostic molecular marker in cholangiocarcinoma. The identification of ROS tyrosine kinase fusions in cholangiocarcinoma, along with the presence of other ROS kinase fusions in lung cancer and glioblastoma, suggests that a more broadly based screen for activated ROS kinase in cancer is warranted.
2    Saborowski, A., M. Saborowski, M. A. Davare, B. J. Druker, D. S. Klimstra, and S. W. Lowe. Mouse model of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma validates FIG-ROS as a potent fusion oncogene and therapeutic target. (2013). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110: 19513-8. pdf 3888.    Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver cancer and responds poorly to existing therapies. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) likely originates from the biliary tree and develops within the hepatic parenchyma. We have generated a flexible orthotopic allograft mouse model of ICC that incorporates common genetic alterations identified in human ICC and histologically resembles the human disease. We examined the utility of this model to validate driver alterations in ICC and tested their suitability as therapeutic targets. Specifically, we showed that the fused-in-glioblastoma-c-ros-oncogene1 (FIG-ROS1(S); FIG-ROS) fusion gene dramatically accelerates ICC development and that its inactivation in established tumors has a potent antitumor effect. Our studies establish a versatile model of ICC that will be a useful preclinical tool and validate ROS1 fusions as potent oncoproteins and therapeutic targets in ICC and potentially other tumor types.
3    Davare, M. A., A. Saborowski, C. A. Eide, C. Tognon, R. L. Smith, J. Elferich, A. Agarwal, J. W. Tyner, U. P. Shinde, S. W. Lowe, and B. J. Druker. Foretinib is a potent inhibitor of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins. (2013). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110: 19519-24. pdf 3963. interesting, is related to pdf 3888 (mouse model of cholangio)    The rapidly growing recognition of the role of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins in the malignant transformation of multiple cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and glioblastoma, is driving efforts to develop effective ROS1 inhibitors for use as molecularly targeted therapy. Using a multidisciplinary approach involving small molecule screening in combination with in vitro and in vivo tumor models, we show that foretinib (GSK1363089) is a more potent ROS1 inhibitor than crizotinib (PF-02341066), an ALK/ROS inhibitor currently in clinical evaluation for lung cancer patients harboring ROS1 rearrangements. Whereas crizotinib has demonstrated promising early results in patients with ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung carcinoma, recently emerging clinical evidence suggests that patients may develop crizotinib resistance due to acquired point mutations in the kinase domain of ROS1, thus necessitating identification of additional potent ROS1 inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. We confirm that the ROS1G2032R mutant, recently reported in clinical resistance to crizotinib, retains foretinib sensitivity at concentrations below safe, clinically achievable levels. Furthermore, we use an accelerated mutagenesis screen to preemptively identify mutations in the ROS1 kinase domain that confer resistance to crizotinib and demonstrate that these mutants also remain foretinib sensitive. Taken together, our data strongly suggest that foretinib is a highly effective ROS1 inhibitor, and further clinical investigation to evaluate its potential therapeutic benefit for patients with ROS1-driven malignancies is warranted.
4    Ong, C. K., C. Subimerb, C. Pairojkul, S. Wongkham, I. Cutcutache, W. Yu, J. R. McPherson, G. E. Allen, C. C. Ng, B. H. Wong, S. S. Myint, V. Rajasegaran, H. L. Heng, A. Gan, Z. J. Zang, Y. Wu, J. Wu, M. H. Lee, D. Huang, P. Ong, W. Chan-on, Y. Cao, C. N. Qian, K. H. Lim, A. Ooi, K. Dykema, K. Furge, V. Kukongviriyapan, B. Sripa, C. Wongkham, P. Yongvanit, P. A. Futreal, V. Bhudhisawasdi, S. Rozen, P. Tan, and B. T. Teh. Exome sequencing of liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. (2012). Nat Genet. 44: 690-3. pdf 3596 in BB2013Mar, 2012-06, referred by 蔡坤志醫師.     Opisthorchis viverrini-related cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a fatal bile duct cancer, is a major public health concern in areas endemic for this parasite. We report here whole-exome sequencing of eight O. viverrini-related tumors and matched normal tissue. We identified and validated 206 somatic mutations in 187 genes using Sanger sequencing and selected 15 genes for mutation prevalence screening in an additional 46 individuals with CCA (cases). In addition to the known cancer-related genes TP53 (mutated in 44.4% of cases), KRAS (16.7%) and SMAD4 (16.7%), we identified somatic mutations in 10 newly implicated genes in 14.8-3.7% of cases. These included inactivating mutations in MLL3 (in 14.8% of cases), ROBO2 (9.3%), RNF43 (9.3%) and PEG3 (5.6%), and activating mutations in the GNAS oncogene (9.3%). These genes have functions that can be broadly grouped into three biological classes: (i) deactivation of histone modifiers, (ii) activation of G protein signaling and (iii) loss of genome stability. This study provides insight into the mutational landscape contributing to O. viverrini-related CCA.
5    Chan-On, W., M. L. Nairismagi, C. K. Ong, W. K. Lim, S. Dima, C. Pairojkul, K. H. Lim, J. R. McPherson, I. Cutcutache, H. L. Heng, L. Ooi, A. Chung, P. Chow, P. C. Cheow, S. Y. Lee, S. P. Choo, I. B. Tan, D. Duda, A. Nastase, S. S. Myint, B. H. Wong, A. Gan, V. Rajasegaran, C. C. Ng, S. Nagarajan, A. Jusakul, S. Zhang, P. Vohra, W. Yu, D. Huang, P. Sithithaworn, P. Yongvanit, S. Wongkham, N. Khuntikeo, V. Bhudhisawasdi, I. Popescu, S. G. Rozen, P. Tan, and B. T. Teh. Exome sequencing identifies distinct mutational patterns in liver fluke-related and non-infection-related bile duct cancers. (2013). Nat Genet. 45: 1474-8. pdf not yet.   The impact of different carcinogenic exposures on the specific patterns of somatic mutation in human tumors remains unclear. To address this issue, we profiled 209 cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) from Asia and Europe, including 108 cases caused by infection with the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini and 101 cases caused by non-O. viverrini-related etiologies. Whole-exome sequencing (n = 15) and prevalence screening (n = 194) identified recurrent somatic mutations in BAP1 and ARID1A, neither of which, to our knowledge, has previously been reported to be mutated in CCA. Comparisons between intrahepatic O. viverrini-related and non-O. viverrini-related CCAs demonstrated statistically significant differences in mutation patterns: BAP1, IDH1 and IDH2 were more frequently mutated in non-O. viverrini CCAs, whereas TP53 mutations showed the reciprocal pattern. Functional studies demonstrated tumor suppressive functions for BAP1 and ARID1A, establishing the role of chromatin modulators in CCA pathogenesis. These findings indicate that different causative etiologies may induce distinct somatic alterations, even within the same tumor type.
6    Jiao, Y., T. M. Pawlik, R. A. Anders, F. M. Selaru, M. M. Streppel, D. J. Lucas, N. Niknafs, V. B. Guthrie, A. Maitra, P. Argani, G. J. Offerhaus, J. C. Roa, L. R. Roberts, G. J. Gores, I. Popescu, S. T. Alexandrescu, S. Dima, M. Fassan, M. Simbolo, A. Mafficini, P. Capelli, R. T. Lawlor, A. Ruzzenente, A. Guglielmi, G. Tortora, F. de Braud, A. Scarpa, W. Jarnagin, D. Klimstra, R. Karchin, V. E. Velculescu, R. H. Hruban, B. Vogelstein, K. W. Kinzler, N. Papadopoulos, and L. D. Wood. Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. (2013). Nat Genet. 45: 1470-3. pdf 3970.    Through exomic sequencing of 32 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, we discovered frequent inactivating mutations in multiple chromatin-remodeling genes (including BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1), and mutation in one of these genes occurred in almost half of the carcinomas sequenced. We also identified frequent mutations at previously reported hotspots in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes encoding metabolic enzymes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. In contrast, TP53 was the most frequently altered gene in a series of nine gallbladder carcinomas. These discoveries highlight the key role of dysregulated chromatin remodeling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
7    Grassian, A. R., R. Pagliarini, and D. Y. Chiang. Mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (2014). Current opinion in gastroenterology. pdf 3978.    PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exome sequencing studies have recently expanded the genetic characterization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Among a number of novel genes, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is recurrently mutated in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. We review the effects of these mutations on several biochemical pathways, as well as potential changes to downstream signaling pathways. RECENT FINDINGS: Hotspot mutations in IDH isoforms 1 or 2 occur in approximately 15% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. These mutations result in elevated levels of an oncometabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate, which is associated with higher DNA CpG methylation and altered histone methylation that accompany a block in cellular differentiation. Exploratory studies have suggested additional phenotypes associated with IDH1/2 mutations. SUMMARY: Tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations may represent a distinct subtype of cholangiocarcinomas. Further studies are required to elucidate the exact role that mutant IDH1/2 and 2-hydroxyglutarate play in tumorigenesis, and what are the best strategies to target these tumor types.
8    Rizvi, S., and G. J. Gores. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. (2013). Gastroenterology. 145: 1215-29. pdf 3979. IDH 1, IDH2 mutation in Figure 2 very good!! 印了 但沒空念    Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are hepatobiliary cancers with features of cholangiocyte differentiation; they can be classified anatomically as intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), or distal CCA. These subtypes differ not only in their anatomic location, but in epidemiology, origin, etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. The incidence and mortality of iCCA has been increasing over the past 3 decades, and only a low percentage of patients survive until 5 years after diagnosis. Geographic variations in the incidence of CCA are related to variations in risk factors. Changes in oncogene and inflammatory signaling pathways, as well as genetic and epigenetic alterations and chromosome aberrations, have been shown to contribute to the development of CCA. Furthermore, CCAs are surrounded by a dense stroma that contains many cancer-associated fibroblasts, which promotes their progression. We have gained a better understanding of the imaging characteristics of iCCAs and have developed advanced cytologic techniques to detect pCCAs. Patients with iCCAs usually are treated surgically, whereas liver transplantation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an option for a subset of patients with pCCAs. We review recent developments in our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of CCA, along with advances in classification, diagnosis, and treatment.
9    Subbiah, I. M., V. Subbiah, A. M. Tsimberidou, A. Naing, A. O. Kaseb, M. Javle, S. Fu, D. S. Hong, S. Piha-Paul, J. J. Wheler, K. R. Hess, F. Janku, G. S. Falchook, R. A. Wolff, and R. Kurzrock. Targeted Therapy of Advanced Gallbladder Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma with Aggressive Biology: Eliciting Early Response Signals from Phase 1 trials. (2013). Oncotarget. 4: 153-62. pdf not yet. cholangioncarcinoma and gallbaldder carcinoma clinical trial    PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GC) have few therapeutic options for relapsed disease. METHODS: Given the overall poor prognosis in this population and the availability of novel targeted therapies, we systematically analyzed the characteristics and outcomes for GC and CC patients treated on phase I trials with an emphasis on targeted agents and locoregional therapies. RESULTS: Of 40 treated patients (GC=6; CC=34; median age, 60 years), 8 (20%) had stable disease (SD) > 6 months, 3 (8%) partial response (PR), on protocols with hepatic arterial drug infusion and anti-angiogenic, anti-HER-2/neu or novel MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Median progression-free survival (PFS) on phase I trials was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.7, 2.8) versus 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4, 5.0), 3.0 months (95% CI 2.3, 4.6), and 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4, 3.9) for their first-, second-, and last-line FDA-approved therapy. In univariate analysis, >3 metastatic sites, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (>56IU/L), serum creatinine (>1.6mg/dL), and CA19-9 (>35U/mL) were associated with a shorter PFS. Mutational analysis revealed mutation in the KRAS oncogene in 2 of 11 patients (18%). The SD >6 months/PR rate of 28% was seen with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, and inhibitors of angiogenesis, HER-2/neu or MEK. CONCLUSIONS: The PFS in phase I trials was similar to that of the first, second, and last-line therapy (P=0.95, 0.98, 0.76, respectively) with FDA-approved agents given in the advanced setting, emphasizing a role for targeted agents in a clinical trials setting as potentially valuable therapeutic options for these patients.
10    Sia, D., V. Tovar, A. Moeini, and J. M. Llovet. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis and rationale for molecular therapies. (2013). Oncogene. 32: 4861-70. pdf 3807. in BB2014Mar. Must Read. cholangiocarcinoma related.     Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive malignancy with very poor prognosis. Genome-wide, high-throughput technologies have made major advances in understanding the molecular basis of this disease, although important mechanisms are still unclear. Recent data have revealed specific genetic mutations (for example, KRAS, IDH1 and IDH2), epigenetic silencing, aberrant signaling pathway activation (for example, interleukin (IL)-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), tyrosine kinase receptor-related pathways) and molecular subclasses with unique alterations (for example, proliferation and inflammation subclasses). In addition, some ICCs share common genomic traits with hepatocellular carcinoma. All this information provides the basis to explore novel targeted therapies. Currently, surgery at early stage is the only effective therapy. At more advanced stages, chemotherapy regimens are emerging (that is, cisplatin plus gemcitabine), along with molecular targeted agents tested in several ongoing clinical trials. Nonetheless, a first-line conclusive treatment remains an unmet need. Similarly, there are no studies assessing tumor response related with genetic alterations. This review explores the recent advancements in the knowledge of the molecular alterations underlying ICC and the future prospects in terms of therapeutic strategies leading towards a more personalized treatment of this neoplasm.
11    Razumilava, N., and G. J. Gores. Cholangiocarcinoma. (2014). Lancet. 383: 2168-79. pdf 3982    Cholangiocarcinoma represents a diverse group of epithelial cancers united by late diagnosis and poor outcomes. Specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are undertaken for cholangiocarcinomas of different anatomical locations (intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal). Mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomas have emerged as a distinct subtype of primary liver cancer. Clinicians need to be aware of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas arising in cirrhosis and properly assess liver masses in this setting for cholangiocarcinoma. Management of biliary obstruction is obligatory in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and advanced cytological tests such as fluorescence in-situ hybridisation for aneusomy are helpful in the diagnosis. Liver transplantation is a curative option for selected patients with perihilar but not with intrahepatic or distal cholangiocarcinoma. International efforts of clinicians and scientists are helping to identify the genetic drivers of cholangiocarcinoma progression, which will unveil early diagnostic markers and direct development of individualised therapies.

1    Wu, Y. M., F. Su, S. Kalyana-Sundaram, N. Khazanov, B. Ateeq, X. Cao, R. J. Lonigro, P. Vats, R. Wang, S. F. Lin, A. J. Cheng, L. P. Kunju, J. Siddiqui, S. A. Tomlins, P. Wyngaard, S. Sadis, S. Roychowdhury, M. H. Hussain, F. Y. Feng, M. M. Zalupski, M. Talpaz, K. J. Pienta, D. R. Rhodes, D. R. Robinson, and A. M. Chinnaiyan. Identification of targetable FGFR gene fusions in diverse cancers. (2013). Cancer discovery. 3: 636-47. pdf 3670. in BB2013June, 2013-06. FGFR Gene fusion. HNSCC.    Through a prospective clinical sequencing program for advanced cancers, four index cases were identified which harbor gene rearrangements of FGFR2, including patients with cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. After extending our assessment of FGFR rearrangements across multiple tumor cohorts, we identified additional FGFR fusions with intact kinase domains in lung squamous cell cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer, oral cancer, glioblastoma, and head and neck squamous cell cancer. All FGFR fusion partners tested exhibit oligomerization capability, suggesting a shared mode of kinase activation. Overexpression of FGFR fusion proteins induced cell proliferation. Two bladder cancer cell lines that harbor FGFR3 fusion proteins exhibited enhanced susceptibility to pharmacologic inhibition in vitro and in vivo. Because of the combinatorial possibilities of FGFR family fusion to a variety of oligomerization partners, clinical sequencing efforts, which incorporate transcriptome analysis for gene fusions, are poised to identify rare, targetable FGFR fusions across diverse cancer types.
2    Arai, Y., Y. Totoki, F. Hosoda, T. Shirota, N. Hama, H. Nakamura, H. Ojima, K. Furuta, K. Shimada, T. Okusaka, A. Kosuge, and T. Shibata. FGFR2 tyrosine kinase fusions define a unique molecular subtype of cholangiocarcinoma. (2013). Hepatology. pdf 3923.  FGFR2. Gene Fusion. Hepatology. 2013 Oct 9. doi: 10.1002/hep.26890.    Cholangiocarcinoma is an intractable cancer, with limited therapeutic options, in which the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor development remain poorly understood. Identification of novel driver oncogene and applying to targeted therapies for molecularly defined cancers might lead to improvements in outcomes of patients. We performed massively-parallel whole transcriptome sequencing in eight specimens from cholangiocarcinoma patients without KRAS/BRAF/ROS1 alterations, and identified two fusion kinase genes, FGFR2-AHCYL1 and FGFR2-BICC1. In reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) screening, the FGFR2 fusion was detected in 9 patients with cholangiocarcinoma (9/102), exclusively in the intrahepatic subtype (9/66, 13.6%), rarely in colorectal (1/149) and hepatocellular carcinoma (1/96), and none in gastric cancer (0/212). The rearrangements were mutually exclusive with KRAS/BRAF mutations. Expression of the fusion kinases in NIH3T3 cells activated MAPK, and conferred anchorage-independent growth and in vivo tumorigenesis of subcutaneous transplanted cells in immune-compromised mice. This transforming ability was attributable to its kinase activity. Treatment with FGFR kinase inhibitors, BGJ398 and PD173074 effectively suppressed transformation. CONCLUSIONS: FGFR2 fusions occur in 13.6% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The expression pattern of these fusions in association with sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors warrant a new molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma and suggest a new therapeutic approach to the disease.
3    Ross, J. S., K. Wang, L. Gay, R. Al-Rohil, J. V. Rand, D. M. Jones, H. J. Lee, C. E. Sheehan, G. A. Otto, G. Palmer, R. Yelensky, D. Lipson, D. Morosini, M. Hawryluk, D. V. Catenacci, V. A. Miller, C. Churi, S. Ali, and P. J. Stephens. New routes to targeted therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas revealed by next-generation sequencing. (2014). Oncologist. 19: 235-42. pdf 4001, FGFR2 fusion, cholangiocarcinoma not read yet! IHC    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a subtype of primary liver cancer that is rarely curable by surgery and is rapidly increasing in incidence. Relapsed ICC has a poor prognosis, and current systemic nontargeted therapies are commonly extrapolated from those used in other gastrointestinal malignancies. We hypothesized that genomic profiling of clinical ICC samples would identify genomic alterations that are linked to targeted therapies and that could facilitate a personalized approach to therapy. Methods. DNA sequencing of hybridization-captured libraries was performed for 3,320 exons of 182 cancer-related genes and 36 introns of 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Sample DNA was isolated from 40 mum of 28 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ICC specimens and sequenced to high coverage. Results. The most commonly observed alterations were within ARID1A (36%), IDH1/2 (36%), and TP53 (36%) as well as amplification of MCL1 (21%). Twenty cases (71%) harbored at least one potentially actionable alteration, including FGFR2 (14%), KRAS (11%), PTEN (11%), CDKN2A (7%), CDK6 (7%), ERBB3 (7%), MET (7%), NRAS (7%), BRCA1 (4%), BRCA2 (4%), NF1 (4%), PIK3CA (4%), PTCH1 (4%), and TSC1 (4%). Four (14%) of the ICC cases featured novel gene fusions involving the tyrosine kinases FGFR2 and NTRK1 (FGFR2-KIAA1598, FGFR2-BICC1, FGFR2-TACC3, and RABGAP1L-NTRK1). Conclusion. Two thirds of patients in this study harbored genomic alterations that are associated with targeted therapies and that have the potential to personalize therapy selection for to individual patients.
4    Borad, M. J., M. D. Champion, J. B. Egan, W. S. Liang, R. Fonseca, A. H. Bryce, A. E. McCullough, M. T. Barrett, K. Hunt, M. D. Patel, S. W. Young, J. M. Collins, A. C. Silva, R. M. Condjella, M. Block, R. R. McWilliams, K. N. Lazaridis, E. W. Klee, K. C. Bible, P. Harris, G. R. Oliver, J. D. Bhavsar, A. A. Nair, S. Middha, Y. Asmann, J. P. Kocher, K. Schahl, B. R. Kipp, E. G. Barr Fritcher, A. Baker, J. Aldrich, A. Kurdoglu, T. Izatt, A. Christoforides, I. Cherni, S. Nasser, R. Reiman, L. Phillips, J. McDonald, J. Adkins, S. D. Mastrian, P. Placek, A. T. Watanabe, J. Lobello, H. Han, D. Von Hoff, D. W. Craig, A. K. Stewart, and J. D. Carpten. (Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Arizon and Mayo Clinic, Minnesota) Integrated genomic characterization reveals novel, therapeutically relevant drug targets in FGFR and EGFR pathways in sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (2014). PLoS Genet. 10: e1004135. pdf 4118.    Advanced cholangiocarcinoma continues to harbor a difficult prognosis and therapeutic options have been limited. During the course of a clinical trial of whole genomic sequencing seeking druggable targets, we examined six patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Integrated genome-wide and whole transcriptome sequence analyses were performed on tumors from six patients with advanced, sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SIC) to identify potential therapeutically actionable events. Among the somatic events captured in our analysis, we uncovered two novel therapeutically relevant genomic contexts that when acted upon, resulted in preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Genome-wide structural analysis of sequence data revealed recurrent translocation events involving the FGFR2 locus in three of six assessed patients. These observations and supporting evidence triggered the use of FGFR inhibitors in these patients. In one example, preliminary anti-tumor activity of pazopanib (in vitro FGFR2 IC50 approximately 350 nM) was noted in a patient with an FGFR2-TACC3 fusion. After progression on pazopanib, the same patient also had stable disease on ponatinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor (in vitro, FGFR2 IC50 approximately 8 nM). In an independent non-FGFR2 translocation patient, exome and transcriptome analysis revealed an allele specific somatic nonsense mutation (E384X) in ERRFI1, a direct negative regulator of EGFR activation. Rapid and robust disease regression was noted in this ERRFI1 inactivated tumor when treated with erlotinib, an EGFR kinase inhibitor. FGFR2 fusions and ERRFI mutations may represent novel targets in sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and trials should be characterized in larger cohorts of patients with these aberrations.
5    Graham, R. P., E. G. Barr Fritcher, E. Pestova, J. Schulz, L. A. Sitailo, G. Vasmatzis, S. J. Murphy, R. R. McWilliams, S. N. Hart, K. C. Halling, L. R. Roberts, G. J. Gores, F. J. Couch, L. Zhang, M. J. Borad, and B. R. Kipp. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 translocations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (2014). Human pathology. 45: 1630-8. pdf 4119.    Patients with cholangiocarcinoma often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. There is a need for effective therapeutic strategies for advanced stage cholangiocarcinoma. Recently, FGFR2 translocations have been identified as a potential target for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. This study evaluated 152 cholangiocarcinomas and 4 intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms of the bile duct for presence of FGFR2 translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization and characterized the clinicopathologic features of cases with FGFR2 translocations. Thirteen (10 women, 3 men; 8%) of 156 biliary tumors harbored FGFR2 translocations, including 12 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (12/96; 13%) and 1 intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Histologically, cholangiocarcinomas with FGFR2 translocations displayed prominent intraductal growth (62%) or anastomosing tubular glands with desmoplasia (38%). Immunohistochemically, the tumors with FGFR2 translocations frequently showed weak and patchy expression of CK19 (77%). Markers of the stem cell phenotype in cholangiocarcinoma, HepPar1 and CK20, were negative in all cases. The median cancer-specific survival for patients whose tumors harbored FGFR2 translocations was 123 months compared to 37 months for cases without FGFR2 translocations (P = .039). This study also assessed 100 cholangiocarcinomas for ERBB2 amplification and ROS1 translocations. Of the cases tested, 3% and 1% were positive for ERBB2 amplification and ROS1 translocation, respectively. These results confirm that FGFR2, ERRB2, and ROS1 alterations are potential therapeutic targets for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.


Aug 3, 2014

HPV and p16 in HNSCC

由 sufang 在 日, 08/03/2014 - 09:25 發表 Oral Cancer HPV hypermethylation MATHFR Methylation NTUH OSPCC p16

2015/05/20 LINE message from 黃道揚醫師
今天先做口咽癌的library, 明天會測試TK preamplificarion是否可以向下做library. (怕樣本DNA不足)
台大的樣本開始上線!!
 
2015/05/13 SF小整理
1. 檢體部分 300例 OSPCC FFPE DNA,  已有HPV Genotyping 以及p16 IHC 染色
2. 台大到高醫運送方式
四月份先送47例, 47 patients' DNA and 3 cell lines' DNA
(Dear Dr. Wang: The standard protocol is 1ul with concentration of 50ng/ul. But please give me more (DNA samples) to manipulate since 1ul is will vaporized during shipment. Do you want to give me 48 samples? or you want to put a cell­line DNA in them?
Please give me at least 5 ul, best put all samples in a 96­ well plate (prefer loading in A1­H1 then A2­ H2, ..., A6 ­H6).
You can ask you assistant to call me at 0975356113 or 0932351464, for fast communication.
3. 黃醫師的步驟 簡述如下: 
The process will be:
3.1. Mixing master Primers (we will take < 5ul for master Fluidigm mixture, total is about 120 ul), we will return your primers when the project is finished.
3.2. Run Fluidigm chip (access Array)
3.3. Barcode PCR
3.4. Purification (步驟1­4, 48個samples/Chip, cost: 4萬, (1個sample 800元))
3.5. Run Miseq 2x150 kit, V3 (這一部份外送生技公司 COST比照中研院約 6萬會請生技公司直接向 CHRISTY請款)
3.6. Data analysis (free for your lab)
4. Oral Cancer Gene Panel (paid by Prof Alex PJ Lou,  total amplicon numbers is 505. This will be around 12x multiplex PCR). 
CASP8 (27), CDKN2A (12), FAT1 (158), GATA3 (17), HRAS (8), NFE2L2 (24), NOTCH1 (89), NSD1 (97), PIK3CA (41), TP53 (20)
ALDH2 rs671 (1), ADH1B rs1229984 (1), MTHFR rs1801133 (1), MTHFR rs1801131 (1), MTHFD1 rs2236225 (1), EGFR exon 19 del E746-A750 (1)
EGFR exon 21 L858R, L861Q (1), HPV16E6 477-bp (1), HPV16E7 297-bp (1), HPV18E6 477-bp (1), HPV18E7 318-bp (1)

Cancer Epigenomics_Folate

由 sufang 在 日, 08/03/2014 - 09:28 發表 Pre-published Cancer epigenomics Folate MATHFR Methionine Methylation SAM

重要文獻 (Research Notes: Cacner epigenomics (folate))
1.    Kane, M. A. (2005) The role of folates in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer detection and prevention 29, 46-53. (pdf 4099.)    The primary objective of this review is to explore the hypothesis that folate insufficiency may be important in the pathogenesis of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) and that folate repletion may be an effective component of chemoprevention. The main results are that folate insufficiency disrupts DNA global and specific gene methylation patterns such that the activity of certain tumor suppressor genes such as p16 and possibly p53 may be lost. Folate pool imbalance and impaired repair mechanisms may contribute to DNA instability and strand breaks. Sensitive methods exist for identification of individuals with folate insufficiency in contrast to the relatively insensitive conventional serum or red cell folate assays with broad "normal" ranges. The impact of folate supplementation can thus be quantified. Folate imbalance may result from alterations in folate cellular uptake by the reduced folate carrier (RFC) and/or the folate receptor (FR) and polymorphisms in enzymes important in folate retention such as folylpolyglutamate synthetase and in folate modification such as methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Known predisposing factors for SCCHN such as alcohol and tobacco carcinogens may influence folate balance. Folate supplementation may reduce primary or secondary risk of cancer. Formal studies of folate sufficiency in persons at risk for or diagnosed and treated for SCCHN are needed to define the role of folate supplementation in the prevention of these cancers.

Chemoprevention

Chemoprevention
由 sufang 在 日, 08/03/2014 - 16:29 發表 Pre-published Chemoprevention COX-2 inhibitor EGCG Folate

Folate 重要文獻:
1.    Kane, M. A. (2005) The role of folates in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer detection and prevention 29, 46-53. (pdf 4099.)    The primary objective of this review is to explore the hypothesis that folate insufficiency may be important in the pathogenesis of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) and that folate repletion may be an effective component of chemoprevention. The main results are that folate insufficiency disrupts DNA global and specific gene methylation patterns such that the activity of certain tumor suppressor genes such as p16 and possibly p53 may be lost. Folate pool imbalance and impaired repair mechanisms may contribute to DNA instability and strand breaks. Sensitive methods exist for identification of individuals with folate insufficiency in contrast to the relatively insensitive conventional serum or red cell folate assays with broad "normal" ranges. The impact of folate supplementation can thus be quantified. Folate imbalance may result from alterations in folate cellular uptake by the reduced folate carrier (RFC) and/or the folate receptor (FR) and polymorphisms in enzymes important in folate retention such as folylpolyglutamate synthetase and in folate modification such as methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Known predisposing factors for SCCHN such as alcohol and tobacco carcinogens may influence folate balance. Folate supplementation may reduce primary or secondary risk of cancer. Formal studies of folate sufficiency in persons at risk for or diagnosed and treated for SCCHN are needed to define the role of folate supplementation in the prevention of these cancers.
2.    Kraunz, K. S., D. Hsiung, M. D. McClean, M. Liu, J. Osanyingbemi, H. H. Nelson, and K. T. Kelsey. (2006) Dietary folate is associated with p16(INK4A) methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 119, 1553-7. (pdf 4098.)    Inactivation of the p16(INK4A) (CDKN2A) gene in the Rb pathway is among the most common somatic alterations observed in tobacco-related solid tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In addition, a low folate diet is an important risk factor for HNSCC. Decreased dietary folate in an animal model of hepatocellular carcinoma has been associated with the induction of epigenetic silencing of the p16(INK4A) gene. In an ongoing population-based study of HNSCC, we sought to extend this observation to human disease testing the hypothesis that p16(INK4A) methylation is associated with decreased dietary folate. We also investigated the association of methylation silencing with functional polymorphisms in the folate metabolism enzyme methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). In 169 HNSCCs, the odds ratio for p16(INK4A) methylation among those with low dietary folate intake was 2.3 (95% CI = 1.1-4.8) when compared with those with high folate intake. Furthermore, this increased risk for epigenetic silencing at p16(INK4A) was modified by the MTHFR alleles previously associated with diminished serum folate levels. Hence, in HNSCC low dietary intake of folate is associated with p16(INK4A) methylation, and this relationship is modified by the MTHFR genotype. Our data provides important evidence for a mechanism of action of folate deficiency in cancer.


Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

由 sufang 在 日, 08/03/2014 - 16:29 發表 Pre-published EBV Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma NPC
重要文獻:
1.    Cheung, A. K., H. L. Lung, J. M. Ko, Y. Cheng, E. J. Stanbridge, E. R. Zabarovsky, J. M. Nicholls, D. Chua, S. W. Tsao, X. Y. Guan, and M. L. Lung. (2009) Chromosome 14 transfer and functional studies identify a candidate tumor suppressor gene, mirror image polydactyly 1, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 14478-83. (pdf 2348)    Chromosome 14 allelic loss is common in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and may reflect essential tumor suppressor gene loss in tumorigenesis. An intact chromosome 14 was transferred to an NPC cell line using a microcell-mediated chromosome transfer approach. Microcell hybrids (MCHs) containing intact exogenously transferred chromosome 14 were tumor suppressive in athymic mice, demonstrating that intact chromosome 14 NPC MCHs are able to suppress tumor growth in mice. Comparative analysis of these MCHs and their derived tumor segregants identified 4 commonly eliminated tumor-suppressive CRs. Here we provide functional evidence that a gene, Mirror-Image POLydactyly 1 (MIPOL1), which maps within a single 14q13.1-13.3 CR and that hitherto has been reported to be associated only with a developmental disorder, specifically suppresses in vivo tumor formation. MIPOL1 gene expression is down-regulated in all NPC cell lines and in approximately 63% of NPC tumors via promoter hypermethylation and allelic loss. SLC25A21 and FOXA1, 2 neighboring genes mapping to this region, did not show this frequent down-regulated gene expression or promoter hypermethylation, precluding possible global methylation effects and providing further evidence that MIPOL1 plays a unique role in NPC. The protein localizes mainly to the nucleus. Re-expression of MIPOL1 in the stable transfectants induces cell cycle arrest. MIPOL1 tumor suppression is related to up-regulation of the p21(WAF1/CIP1) and p27(KIP1) protein pathways. This study provides compelling evidence that chromosome 14 harbors tumor suppressor genes associated with NPC and that a candidate gene, MIPOL1, is associated with tumor development.